<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WASP Blog &#187; Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/tag/analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com</link>
	<description>Just about Web Analytics Solution Profiler and online analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Automated SiteCatlyst version scan with WASP Pro</title>
		<link>http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/2010/10/automated-sitecatlyst-version-scan-with-wasp-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/2010/10/automated-sitecatlyst-version-scan-with-wasp-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Renouf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14.9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.20.3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sitecatalyst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Migrating SiteCatalyst to version 14.9 ?

Migrating Google Analytic to asynchronous tags ?

Any time there is a major update in your analytic tagging, such as required new variable or javascript changes that require references to new Javascript code site can be a real problem, insuring that all the tag have been updated can be a real long process and verifying large site by hand can be almost impossible.

To ease this process, you can use the scanning capability of WASP Pro on order to automated the crawling of your web site and give you the proper report that would allow you to detect quickly the pages that have not been updated or are missing tag altogether.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Migrating SiteCatalyst to version 14.9 ?</p>
<p>Any time there is a major update in your analytic tagging, such as necessary new variables or javascript changes that require references to new Javascript code, it can take ages to ensure that all of your tags are updated properly. Verifying large sites by hand is nearly impossible.</p>
<p>To ease this process, you can use the scanning capability of WASP Pro. This simple tool will automatically crawl your entire website and provide a detailed report of which pages have not been updated or are missing tags altogether.</p>
<p>Let me show you how WASP Pro does this. First, you define what you want to scan, including how many pages you want to scan, maximum depth, and even rules as regular expression to filter pages in or out of your scan.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/limit.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-225" title="limit" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/limit.png" alt="" width="373" height="224" /></a></p>
<p>Once the scan is complete, you can view a report that shows you all of the analytic solutions detected and the number of pages that have the solution integrated.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/report1.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-226 alignnone" title="report1" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/report1.png" alt="" width="603" height="134" /></a></p>
<p>If you click on the tagged pages, you will see a list of all the pages with those tags, in a table format. If you click on the missing pages, you will see all the pages missing those tags. In the example below, we clicked on the missing pages for Omniture SiteCatalyst.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/nonereport.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-227 alignnone" title="nonereport" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/nonereport.png" alt="" width="696" height="309" /></a></p>
<p>We also have what we call the &#8220;upside down&#8221; view. Instead of looking at the data at the page level in a table, we give it to you at the tag level using a tree. You can drill down into every single variable and value in order to see what page have those values. If we take our Omniutre SiteCatalyst example, you can see specifically what pages are tagged with what version.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/explore.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-229" title="explore" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/explore.png" alt="" width="452" height="258" /></a></p>
<p>And of course you can always export any of the data in .csv format to analyze in other tools such as Excel.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/saveall.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-231" title="saveall" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/saveall.png" alt="" width="886" height="298" /></a></p>
<p>Naturally, once you have your report you can use the interactive functionality of WASP to diagnose the pages that are causing you problems and make sure all your pages are properly tagged.</p>
<p>Feel free to contact us for an interactive demo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/2010/10/automated-sitecatlyst-version-scan-with-wasp-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Runs Analytics? Top 500 Retail Websites Report</title>
		<link>http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/2010/02/who-run-analytics-top-500-retail-web-site-report/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/2010/02/who-run-analytics-top-500-retail-web-site-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Renouf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In January 2010, iPerceptions ran an analysis of the top 500 retail websites to determine how many were using web analytics tools. Online retailers are recognized leaders when it comes to integrating new web applications. A fast-growing, conversion-driven group, their choices often foreshadow those of other industries. Using iPerceptionsâ€™ WASP Market Research, we fed the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/balloon2.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-116" title="Analytics Market Analysis" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/balloon2.png" alt="" width="346" height="171" /></a>In January 2010, iPerceptions ran an analysis of the top 500 retail websites to determine how many were using web analytics tools. Online retailers are recognized leaders when it comes to integrating new web applications. A fast-growing, conversion-driven group, their choices often foreshadow those of other industries. Using iPerceptionsâ€™ WASP Market Research, we fed the Internet Retailer Top 500 Retail Web Sites into the WASP crawler, and based our results on the 458 sites that were operational. Last January, StÃ©phane Hamel, founder of Immeria, wrote â€œAn Immersion in Analyticsâ€ after conducting a similar study of the same sites. His results form our 2009 data.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">WHO RUNS ANALYTICS</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/useoftools.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-94 aligncenter" title="Use of Clickstream Analytics" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/useoftools.png" alt="Use of Clickstream Analytics" width="405" height="250" /></a></p>
<p>In the last year, the use of clickstream analytics tools rose by 10% in the online retail space. External research confrmed a 9% growth in clickstream analytics technology in 2009, which suggests that technological growth is in line with market consumption.</p>
<h2>Breakdown by Vendor</h2>
<p><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Breakdown-by-Vendor.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-95" title="Breakdown by Vendor" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Breakdown-by-Vendor.png" alt="Breakdown by Vendor" width="518" height="401" /></a></p>
<p>When the results were broken down by vendor, the use of Google Analytics increased by 19% â€” more than twice as much as the next leading vendor. Google Analytics is a free product, unlike the ones from Omniture and Coremetrics, which surely accounted for at least some of its growth. Among paid products, Omniture gained the most ground through 2009, confrming that these tools have a great deal of value.</p>
<h2>Is one tool enough?</h2>
<h2><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Is-One-Tool-Enough.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-96" title="Is One Tool Enough" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Is-One-Tool-Enough.png" alt="Is One Tool Enough" width="442" height="276" /></a></h2>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">% of the Top 500 Sites Running Clickstream Analytics by Number of Tools</h2>
<p>In the last year, the share of retail websites running more than one clickstream analytics tool increased by 9%, begging the questionâ€” why is one tool not enough? Are retailers comparing results from multiple tools to ensure accuracy of the data? Or, does no existing product satisfy all retailing analytics needs?</p>
<div id="attachment_97" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 408px"><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/GoogleComparison.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-97" title="% of the Top 500 Sites Running Clickstream Analytics by Number of Tools" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/GoogleComparison.png" alt="" width="398" height="288" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">% of the Top 500 Sites Running Clickstream Analytics by Number of Tools</p></div>
<p>In January 2010, online retailers who were using more than one tool were almost certainly using Google Analytics. Results suggest that Google Analytics is the easy (and fnancially justifable) choice among retailers, but it is not always the frst choice among customers who are looking for specifc functionality and can afford it.</p>
<h2>Other website tools</h2>
<p><a href="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/OtherWebsiteTools.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-98" title="OtherWebsiteTools" src="http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/OtherWebsiteTools.png" alt="" width="471" height="251" /></a></p>
<p>The second most popular tool, after clickstream analytics, was an advertising network (Ad network), used by approximately one-third of online retailers to host ads. Testing tools, such as Google Website Optimizer and Omniture Test and Target, came in third, followed by Search Engine Marketing (SEM) tools, such as ChannelAdvisor and comScore. Voice of Customer (VOC) tools, such as iPerceptionsâ€™ webValidator and 4Q Survey, were used by 8% of retailers (incidentally, a signifcantly higher use compared to other industry sites). Targeting, such as Amadesa, and Recorder tools, such as ClickTale have low adoption rates in this market. Social sharing tools, such as RPX and AddThis, are also on the rise, with more sites wanting to integrate social media components, liaise with social media/networking sites, and generally create a sense of community.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Running clickstream analytics tools is becoming increasingly important for major online retailers. Google Analytics is the most popular tool, and has gained signifcant market share. Still, there is evidence that paid products still have a safe hold. Based on the premise that retail websites predict behavior in other industries, the use of additional analytics tools will continue to gain momentum. Finally, as clickstream tools reach market saturation and retailers reach the limit of insights gain through these tools, they will increasingly turn to other analytics solution such as Testing, SEM, VoC to enhance the effciency and quality of their online experience.</p>
<h2>About WASP</h2>
<address><span style="font-size: x-small;">WASP is a software that allows web analytics professionals to easily perform quality assurance and understand how their web analytics solution is implemented. The WASP Market Research edition includes a powerful crawler that can automate tool detections and detailed reporting for quality assurance or market research. For more information, please visit webanalyticssolutionprofler.com</span></address>
<h2>About iPerceptions</h2>
<address><span style="font-size: x-small;">iPerceptions is a leading web-focused Voice of Customer analytics provider. Its webValidator Continuous Listening solution, A&amp;B Interactive Dashboard, WASP (Web Analytics Solution Profler), iPerceptions Satisfaction Index (iPSI) and free website survey solution (4Q) turn thousands of data points into easy-to- understand strategic and tactical decision support for website marketers. iPerceptionsâ€™ clients include such well-known brands as InterContinental Hotels, General Motors, Dell, Hyundai, LG Electronics, Choice Hotels International, BMW and Monster Worldwide.</span></address>
<p><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/darenouf/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.png" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.webanalyticssolutionprofiler.com/2010/02/who-run-analytics-top-500-retail-web-site-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

